Solutions
Scientific Consistency and Narrative Governance
Scientific Foundations
AutoBio maintains a living, evidence-grounded system of record that tracks competitor studies from early development through approval. Trial designs, endpoints (PFS, OS, ORR, DOR), efficacy readouts, and safety signals are normalized across heterogeneous studies—so teams can see what’s comparable, what’s not, and why.
Updates propagate automatically as trials initiate, read out, publish, or change status. Experts oversee comparability and guardrails, preserving scientific discipline and preventing cross-trial overreach. Competitive awareness stays current, factual, and defensible—without drifting into interpretation.
Typical Outputs
Cross-phase competitive study comparison tables
Normalized endpoint and outcome crosswalks
Safety and AE-of-interest tracking by therapeutic area
Study design and comparability annotations
Living update logs with source traceability
Primary Users
Medical Affairs teams monitoring evolving competitor data
Clinical and development leaders assessing trial design and endpoint alignment
MSLs and scientific teams preparing evidence-grounded discussions
Competitive intelligence and knowledge owners maintaining up-to-date benchmarks
Guardrails against hallucination and scientific drift
Structured workflows, evidence grounding, and expert oversight prevent unsupported claims, confabulation, and narrative overreach.
Claim-level citation and source traceability
Scientific and medical assertion is linked to underlying data, literature, or approved internal sources, with full transparency on inputs used.
Autonomous execution within defined scientific constraints
AutoBio executes multi-step workflows independently—within the boundaries of your data, instructions, and governance rules.
Proactive clarification to resolve ambiguity
The platform identifies gaps, conflicts, or unclear inputs and autonomously prompts follow-up questions before proceeding.
